Skip to content

DriveLock Product Feedback & Ideas

← DriveLock & idgard Feedback Portal

Share your ideas for DriveLock.

Submit improvement ideas, explore existing ones, and vote on what matters most.

Teilen Sie Ihre Ideen mit DriveLock.

Reichen Sie Verbesserungsvorschläge ein, sehen Sie bestehende Ideen und stimmen Sie ab.

What is missing or could work better in DriveLock?

(thinking…)

Enter your idea and we'll search to see if someone has already suggested it.

If a similar idea already exists, you can support and comment on it.

If it doesn't exist, you can post your idea so others can support it.

Enter your idea and we'll search to see if someone has already suggested it.

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

5 results found

  1. More differentiation in the settings of the Self-Service unlock

    We would like to enable our employees to selectively share specific drives without much effort on your part.
    The "effort" should be in the configuration. So that we can configure the users a self service unlock, in which we can select e.g. specifically the sub-module "CD/DVD drive" and not as before the entire module "drives".

    Example of how the configuration could end up being:

    Share computer
    CD/DVD Drives
    Max.20 minutes
    Simplified modules; Hide modules & share all
    Advanced Options - File Filter....

    -> Would increase acceptance by our users and also DL protection as the file filter and logging would…

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    on the roadmap  ·  2 comments  ·  Device/Drive Control  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  2. SB-Freigabe weiter einschränken als Geräte-Typ

    In den Eigenschaften einer SB-Freigabe ist es lediglich möglich einzuschränken, ob Laufwerke / Geräte / Smartphones etc. freigegeben werden können. Es kann nicht weiter differenziert werden, welche Geräteklassen freigegeben werden können z.B. sollen nur USB-Controller freigegeben werden dürfen nicht aber Smartcard readers o.ä. .

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    on the roadmap  ·  1 comment  ·  Device/Drive Control  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  3. Verknüpfung beim Inhaltstest von Dateien sollte frei wählbar sein

    Bei bspw. klassifizierten Dokumenten nach ISO 27001 sollte es möglich sein den Inhaltstest bspw. so zu definieren z.B. Typdefinition docx und ("Intern" oder "Öffentlich") und nicht ("Vertraulich" oder "Streng Vertraulich") . So kann sichergestellt werden das nur docx-Dateien exportiert werden dürfen die als Intern oder Öffentlich klassifiziert sind. Für diesen Ansatz müssten bestimmt Regeln auch negiert werden können.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    on the roadmap  ·  0 comments  ·  Device/Drive Control  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  4. Dynamische Benutzergruppen

    Aktuell besteht nur die Möglichkeit eine statische Benutzergruppe im DOC zu erstellen. Für unser Berechtigungskonzept benötigen wir jedoch auch hier dynamische Benutzergruppen, da wir uns auf das Active Directory beziehen. Mit mehreren dynamischen Benutzergruppe könnten wir uns viele AD-Berechtigungsgruppe sparen und gezielt Geräte bzw. Laufwerke innerhalb vom DOC berechtigen.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    on the roadmap  ·  2 comments  ·  Device/Drive Control  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  5. Network Bridging: enable temporary deactivation

    Hello,

    We are looking for a solution how to disable network bridging in a simple way for a short time.

    We are currently deploying only one policy and do not want to switch to a second policy just to disable bridging. Is it possible that something like this will be implemented in the future? As soon as I temporarily unlock the computer that I also have the option to disable bridging?

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    on the roadmap  ·  4 comments  ·  Device/Drive Control  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
  • Don't see your idea?

DriveLock Product Feedback & Ideas

Categories