AdminAndreas Fuchs
(Product Management, DriveLock SE)
My feedback
7 results found
-
1 vote
An error occurred while saving the comment -
1 vote
An error occurred while saving the comment Thanks for the input! We’ve taken a closer look and realized another core issue. Rather than just adding a notification, we’re reclassifying this as a bug and are streamlining the installer to be faster and far more interruption-tolerant.
Cheers!
-
4 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment -
4 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment -
3 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment -
4 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment What about session timeouts? Is session time out set to "no"?
See https://drivelock.uservoice.com/forums/913885/suggestions/43741092 -
3 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment It is irrelevant for cloud managed service. For on-prem customers it is on the roadmap
Headline:
Allow Logical AND Configuration for Group Membership Evaluation in DriveLock Groups
Description:
Currently, DriveLock groups evaluate their members using a logical OR: a user is considered part of the parent group if they are a member of any of the member groups. The requested feature is to allow configuration of the group logic to use a logical AND as well—meaning a user would only be considered part of the parent group if they are a member of all specified subgroups.
This option should be configurable in the UI, allowing administrators to choose between union (OR) and intersection (AND) logic when defining group memberships. Although intersection is already supported internally and is even the default behavior under the hood, there is currently no way to configure this in the user interface.