Skip to content

DriveLock Customer Forum

Information

EN: Please share your ideas and suggestions for improvement with us.
At DriveLock, we want to be able to better understand and evaluate your concerns and are working to continually improve our products. Here in our forum you can leave ideas and suggestions, or view and vote for others' ideas. 
You are welcome to write your input in German, and we will translate it into English for you so that as many of our customers as possible can participate.

DE: Bitte teilen Sie uns Ihre Ideen und Verbesserungsvorschläge mit.
Wir von DriveLock möchten Ihre Anliegen besser verstehen und bewerten können und arbeiten an der ständigen Verbesserung unserer Produkte. Hier in unserem Forum können Sie Ideen und Anregungen hinterlassen, oder auch die Ideen anderer einsehen und für sie stimmen. 
Sie können gerne Ihre Eingaben in Deutsch verfassen, wir werden für Sie die Übersetzung ins Englische übernehmen, damit möglichst viele unserer Kunden an den Vorschlägen teilhaben können.


How can we improve DriveLock?

(thinking…)

Enter your idea and we'll search to see if someone has already suggested it.

If a similar idea already exists, you can support and comment on it.

If it doesn't exist, you can post your idea so others can support it.

Enter your idea and we'll search to see if someone has already suggested it.

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

3 results found

  1. Defender management / Send e-mail alert from the server-side

    I would like to receive an e-mail alert when a "Severe" Defender-event is fired. This might be possible to be done via SMTP on the agent/client which seems a little odd in 2023.

    Such E-Mail-Alerts should be configurable for certain events on the server-side (Web-Interface).

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    released  ·  1 comment  ·  Alerts / Analytics & Forensics  ·  Admin →

  2. Anonymization of personal data in DOC views

    Data related to a single person (for example, user names or computer names) should only be visible in any DOC view, if the anonymization has been manually deactivated and if either the current user has a special permission which is allowing to view this data or a second user with appropriate permissions has logged in additionally (four-eyes principle).

    0 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Alerts / Analytics & Forensics  ·  Admin →

  3. DOC: Filter for timestamp should be more granular

    I want to identify actions on uncertain times (E.g: Actions out of business hours or during the weekend).
    At the moment my only filter possibilities are e.g. last hour, last day, last x weeks etc. There is no possibility to define granular timeframes like "not from 9 to 5"

    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Alerts / Analytics & Forensics  ·  Admin →
  • Don't see your idea?

DriveLock Customer Forum

Categories

Feedback and Knowledge Base

(thinking…)