Skip to content

DriveLock Product Feedback & Ideas


Share your ideas for DriveLock.

Submit improvement ideas, explore existing ones, and vote on what matters most.

Teilen Sie Ihre Ideen mit DriveLock.

Reichen Sie Verbesserungsvorschläge ein, sehen Sie bestehende Ideen und stimmen Sie ab.

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

4 results found

  1. Display estimated remaining scan time when a USB stick is inserted

    We would like to see approximately how long the scan takes as soon as a USB stick is inserted.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Unfortunately, this issue cannot be resolved at the moment. To scan, we call the command line version of the Defender MpCmdRun.exe. While this action initiates the scanning process, it does not provide any feedback or progress updates.

  2. 3rd party events should be directly sent by SMTP/SNMP

    it seams 3rd party event can only be sent to the DES as oppose to DriveLock events that can be sent directly by the agent through SNMP/SMTP. Ths should be the case for 3rd party events too.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  3. Too many messages, event ID: 129, because of locked devices

    Every time a user connects an iPhone or Android phone to a computer, our Drivelock server gets a message that a device has been connected there. This is not allowed by us and the device will be locked, then different
    Messages are sent Event ID: 129.
    Now my question, is it possible to create a rule in these cases:
    That the user always gets a message (bigger message, not only in the systray) to disconnect the device immediately until he disconnects the device? So that always new messages appear, which the user must click away and he is quasi forced…

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  4. EDR new responses (email, snmp, ...)

    actually responses definition include Powershell, Batch, Command line, Awareness and taken picture. It should be extend to E-Mail, SNMP Trap and Web-hook. At least E-Mail should be implement. That way one could decide to send E-Mail based on filtered event.

    It is actually possible to send E-Mail for a complete event-type but not to define further condition under which the E-Mail should be sent ( user, folder, computer, etc, ...). Of course it is possible to write script but E-Mail is already there in the solution.

    It sould be although possible to restrict the action repetition if one action (f.e…

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Fine-grained notification logic (E-Mail/SNMP/Webhooks based on filtered events) is better handled by external SIEM/SOAR or automation platforms. Implementing this within the EDR response engine would duplicate functionality and conflict with the current platform architecture strategy.

  • Don't see your idea?