Skip to content

DriveLock Customer Forum

Information

EN: Please share your ideas and suggestions for improvement with us.
At DriveLock, we want to be able to better understand and evaluate your concerns and are working to continually improve our products. Here in our forum you can leave ideas and suggestions, or view and vote for others' ideas. 
You are welcome to write your input in German, and we will translate it into English for you so that as many of our customers as possible can participate.

DE: Bitte teilen Sie uns Ihre Ideen und Verbesserungsvorschläge mit.
Wir von DriveLock möchten Ihre Anliegen besser verstehen und bewerten können und arbeiten an der ständigen Verbesserung unserer Produkte. Hier in unserem Forum können Sie Ideen und Anregungen hinterlassen, oder auch die Ideen anderer einsehen und für sie stimmen. 
Sie können gerne Ihre Eingaben in Deutsch verfassen, wir werden für Sie die Übersetzung ins Englische übernehmen, damit möglichst viele unserer Kunden an den Vorschlägen teilhaben können.


  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

24 results found

  1. COM Port Management

    We would like to control and manage COM Ports (especially Virtual COM Ports, USB-Serial adapters) in the same way per whitelist rules equal to Drives or other devices like Smartphones, HID devices etc.

    In short, possibility of User and Computer combination.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. Enforce maximum temporary unlock time in DOC

    it was possible to enforce a maximum duration for temporary unlock set by the mmc through policy settings. This capability is now gone with the DOC and it makes possible for administrators / helpdesk users to set very long time in order to please end users. It should be possible to define a maximum unlock time in order to enforce company policy like it was the case before the DOC.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. Verknüpfung beim Inhaltstest von Dateien sollte frei wählbar sein

    Bei bspw. klassifizierten Dokumenten nach ISO 27001 sollte es möglich sein den Inhaltstest bspw. so zu definieren z.B. Typdefinition docx und ("Intern" oder "Öffentlich") und nicht ("Vertraulich" oder "Streng Vertraulich") . So kann sichergestellt werden das nur docx-Dateien exportiert werden dürfen die als Intern oder Öffentlich klassifiziert sind. Für diesen Ansatz müssten bestimmt Regeln auch negiert werden können.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Device Control  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  4. Dateitypdefinitionen: Eigenschaften im Footer der Datei Prüfen

    Um eine noch feinere Filterung von Dateitypen zu definieren, wäre eine zusätzliche Prüfung auf den "footer" der Datei in meinen Augen sinnvoll. Beispielsweise wäre hier GnuPG zu nennen wo man dann auf "--BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY" und "--END PGP PUBLIC KEY" prüfen kann und nur wenn beide als positiv zurückgegeben werden, die Datei auch freigegeben wird

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Device Control  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. Erkennung von "embedded Files" in Office bzw. PDF Dateien

    Derzeit erkennt DriveLock leider keine "embedded Files" in MS Office oder PDF Dateien. Aus Gründen der Sicherheit wäre es erforderlich das DriveLock diese erkennt und mit dem Filter für erlaubte Files abgleicht. So kann sichergestellt werden das bspw. keine ausführbaren Dateien über diesen Weg "geschleust" werden. Also wären z.B. Bild und Video Dateien als "embedded" erlaubt aber eben keine *.exe Dateien.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. USB-Laufwerke aus Regeln entfernen

    Es sollte möglich sein, dass Einträge aus bestehenden Laufwerksregeln (DOC - Sicherheitskontrollen - Laufwerke - Regeln) entfernt werden können, indem man die entsprechenden Laufwerke unter DOC - Inventar - Geräte - Laufwerke vorher selektiert hat.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Device Control  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. Possibility to define online remote unlock similar as the SelfService group settings

    While unlocking BitLock2Go encrypted sticks via remote unlock the access is only granted to user (which are not in the allowed list) if in the Remote Unlock Wizard the option "deactivate enforced encryption".
    We would therefore like to have an option to set this checkbox always similar to selfservice groups where this is possible to be (Optional) set / disabled. This could be for example a role permission which is enabled for the helpdesk role.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  8. SB-Freigabe weiter einschränken als Geräte-Typ

    In den Eigenschaften einer SB-Freigabe ist es lediglich möglich einzuschränken, ob Laufwerke / Geräte / Smartphones etc. freigegeben werden können. Es kann nicht weiter differenziert werden, welche Geräteklassen freigegeben werden können z.B. sollen nur USB-Controller freigegeben werden dürfen nicht aber Smartcard readers o.ä. .

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  9. Enable Filter/Searching in old Policy

    Currently when you open a old Version of a Policy lots of options in a device collection are disabled. You can't filter or export the list.
    Either being able to filter the list directly or being able to export it as a csv would help us tremendously to check what devices where in that older version.
    Currently our workaround requires exporting the whole policy. Creating a new temporary Policy. Loading the settings from the exported policy. And then searching for our required information. Afterwards deleting the policy.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Device Control  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  10. Seperate Permissions to Add / Delete Devices from a Device Collection

    Currently in depth Whitelist rules can only be set in the Management Console. In there we mostly work with Device Collection. We set a rule with a certain behavior, people it affects, etc. and then connect it with a Device Collection. After that the main effort is in adding new devices to that Device List.

    We would like to split the administrative load and have main administrators that set up rules and policies. And then we would like a seperate user group with limited permissions that can only add or remove devices from existing device collections. It is important for…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Device Control  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  11. Ability to disable Logging for specific uses of the Usage Policy

    When using a Usage Policy with different rules we would sometimes not want the rule to be logged with our enterprise Service (or at least be able to filter it out of our log).
    Example:
    We have one Rule that creates Usage Policies that we want to see to validate the device daily and add it to the permanent whitelist.
    We have a different rule where we would like to show a Usage Policy to that user group for certain devices they connect. We have no need to see this Log in our DOC.

    Right now we either get all…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Device Control  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  12. Ability to create rule specific Usage Policy text

    As an Admin I have a wide variety of use cases for Usage Policys. Sadly right now it seems I can only set one Custom Text for the Usage Policy.
    In a optimal situation I would like to display different Text of the Usage Policy depending on what rule is triggered.
    Example:
    Rule 1 is triggered for HID and tells the user HID devices are allowed if they have been provided by the Company.
    Rule 2 is triggered for a special Testing Group within the organisation for every printer that is usually blocked. This tells them they can use this…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Device Control  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  13. Want to remote write volume.id files (from DOC).

    We do need a feature to write volume.id files remotely.
    This should be implemented via DOC.
    We can not install the DMC everywhere on clients, just to write
    a volume.id. Also the device (production machines) are to heavy
    to carry them into the IT department for whitelisting.
    Signing the volume.id with password would be fine for us,
    we don't need it full implemented, like signing with certificates.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  14. Analog zur Cross-Network Protection bei WIFI soll diese auch bei 2 LAN Verbindungen blockieren können

    Drivelock bietet bereits die Funktionalität bei einer bestehenden Ethernetverbindung WIFI zu blockieren. (adminhdb S136 4.1.2). Der Wunsch ist nun das bei einer bestehenden EthernetVerbindung eine weitere EthernetVerbindung (egal welcher BUS) automatisch blockiert werden kann, um so auch ein Bridging mittels 2 LAN Adaptern zu unterbinden.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Device Control  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  15. Format BitLocker2Go USB removables like in Encryption2Go

    In Encryption2Go it is possible to format the USB removables before encryption and keep the data if necessary - these options are completely missing in BitLocker2Go.

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  16. Configure automatic temporary unlock in the future (from time x to time y)

    We have repeated requests for USB releases for specific time periods in the future. Would it be possible in the helpdesk temporary unlock window to select a period in the future with time and date specification?

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  17. Permanently unlock devices directly from within the DOC

    With 2021.2 permanently unlocking single drives has become easier than ever before. It would be great to have the same capability for other devices like cameras, smartphones.
    Unlocking applications previously blocked by DriveLock application control has been added with 2022.1.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    planned  ·  0 comments  ·  Device Control  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  18. USB tethering

    Add an option to block connecting to the Internet by using usb tethering on your smartphone (android and apple).

    Usb tethering creates a Remote NDIS based Internet Sharing Device.

    11 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  19. Share "wireless" screen content via USB

    Dear DriveLock Team,
    It would be very useful to enable a class of devices that can transfer the desktop screen content via USB (Click2Share in customer meeting rooms). For example, similar to the cell phones. Possibly this can also be released semi-automatically and not wait for the IT release.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  20. Network Bridging: enable temporary deactivation

    Hello,

    We are looking for a solution how to disable network bridging in a simple way for a short time.

    We are currently deploying only one policy and do not want to switch to a second policy just to disable bridging. Is it possible that something like this will be implemented in the future? As soon as I temporarily unlock the computer that I also have the option to disable bridging?

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
← Previous 1
  • Don't see your idea?

Feedback and Knowledge Base