Skip to content

DriveLock Customer Forum

Information

EN: Please share your ideas and suggestions for improvement with us.
At DriveLock, we want to be able to better understand and evaluate your concerns and are working to continually improve our products. Here in our forum you can leave ideas and suggestions, or view and vote for others' ideas. 
You are welcome to write your input in German, and we will translate it into English for you so that as many of our customers as possible can participate.

DE: Bitte teilen Sie uns Ihre Ideen und Verbesserungsvorschläge mit.
Wir von DriveLock möchten Ihre Anliegen besser verstehen und bewerten können und arbeiten an der ständigen Verbesserung unserer Produkte. Hier in unserem Forum können Sie Ideen und Anregungen hinterlassen, oder auch die Ideen anderer einsehen und für sie stimmen. 
Sie können gerne Ihre Eingaben in Deutsch verfassen, wir werden für Sie die Übersetzung ins Englische übernehmen, damit möglichst viele unserer Kunden an den Vorschlägen teilhaben können.


  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

43 results found

  1. Check PBA Prerequisites - availibility of CA-certifiate "Microsoft Corporation UEFI CA 2011"

    Many new notebook systems of the manufacturers HP and Lenovo are shipped with the CA-certifictate
    "Microsoft Corporation UEFI CA 2011" disabled in their firmware settings.

    The DriveLock-PBA is signed with this CA-certificate. So this CA-certificate needs to be enabled and
    available on a system in advance of installing the DriveLock-PBA.

    The installation routine of the DriveLock-PBA should verify if this CA-certifiacte is enabled and available on a system
    when attepmpting to install the PBA, and write a message of level=Error when detecting this CA-certificate is not available
    on a system.
    With this enhancement the administrator of a DriveLock environment will…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Since version 23.1 there is a message with EventID=757 “SecureBoot is enabled but the Microsoft Corporation UEFI CA 2011 certificate is missing.”. This function is therefore already implemented. Please configure this event in a policy so that it is sent from clients to the DES.

  2. Wiederholung von Fehlgeschlagenen Installationen

    Wir lassen Drivelock automatisch Installieren, indem Drivelock bestimmte AD-Verzeichnisse scannt.
    Jetzt ist der Server aber ausgelastet oder Systeme sind zu dem Zeitpunkt nicht mehr am Netzwerk, da die Systeme nach der Installation des Betriebssystems ausgeschaltet werden und dann erst im AD verschoben werden.
    Der Scann des ADs erfolgt anscheinen nur zu jeder vollen Stunde und dies lässt sich leider nicht ändern.

    Kann man implementieren, dass Drivelock fehlgeschlagene Installationen (Netzwerkname wurde nicht gefunden, RPC-Server ausgelastet etc) nicht regelmässig wiederholt?

    RPC-Server ausgelastet vielleicht zur nächsten vollen Stunde immer wieder.
    Netzwerkname nicht gefunden alle 8 Stunden.

    Allgemein finde ich es als Verantwortlicher etwas…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. Security Awareness Statistik in DOC aufräumen oder in Arcive verschieben

    Statistics in DOC
    Arcify or clean up to get a better overview

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  4. Use fingerprint and/or face recognition at DriveLock PBA (Windows Hello support)

    When using the Drivelock PBA with Yubikeys to implement a 2FA, the use of fingerprint scanners and facial recognition is not possible. Login works with PIN or username/password.
    We have notebooks with fingerprint and face recognition in use. If you activate the functionality in Windows, the Drivelock PBA does not work anymore. The PBA cannot be installed or uninstalled. The PBA users are not synchronized. This means that the additional logon methods cannot be used. With the PBA fingerprint and face recognition should be possible.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    The current PBA does not support face recognition or fingerprint. UEFI does not support that. The request is closed. There is a possibility that we will revisit the issue at some point with further development. Thank you for your understanding.

  5. Using VMWare workstation , USB Device can be accessed in VM Client even though it is blocked in host machine..

    Using VMWare workstation , USB Device can be accessed in VM Client even though it is blocked in host machine..

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. Deactivate MQTT on the server

    It should be possible to disable MQTT on the server side as well. The existing option to disable MQTT on the client side via policy is not sufficient in my opinion. It should best be configurable via a feature in the DMC UI.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Usability  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Disabling MQTT by policy provides a way to respond to restrictions on the use of MQTT communications in certain situations and environments.


    We do not foresee disabling MQTT server-side at this time, as it is a central part of the DriveLock components' technical communication, the use of which will continue to expand in the future.

  7. Manual input of the stored uninstall password

    Enable manual entry of the stored uninstall password. Either during uninstallation via "Programs and Features" or another entry "Uninstall Agent" via the systray icon of the DL Agent.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Thank you for posting this request on our feedback forum.


    This uninstall password is an additional layer of security to prevent local admins in environments without a zero trust approach from uninstalling the DriveLock agent part.

    If for any reasons a single agent needs to be removed we already provide the possibility to use the following administration command-line:


    msiexec /x DriveLockAgent.msi UNINSTPWD=<your_password>


    The password is checked before the inner MSI part is executed. We would have to change this in order to fulfill requests like this one and decided not to lower security measures here, a while ago.


    Please feel free to get in touch with us directly to discuss this in more detail.

  8. Nach dem Test die Fehler anschauen

    Leider ist es in der Aktuellen Version nach Abschluss der Fragen nicht möglich zusehen was man falsch beantwortet hat man sieht nur unten die runden Punkte mit X wenn man darauf kickt passiert nichts, hier wäre es gut die Frage nochmals zu sehen mit was wurde geantwortet und was wäre richtig gewesen

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  9. Fehler Auswertung der Kampagne im DOC

    Ist es möglich das im DOC nicht nur die Anzahl der Fehler ausgewertet werden können, sondern auch Welche Fehler gemacht wurden?
    Von welchen Benutzern

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  10. DriveLock Linux Agent should be able to send all existing events to other external systems via email

    As an administrator I want to let the Linux Agent send all drivelock agent events also to external systems.
    It should work similar like DriveLock Agents for Windows OS.
    If we can define a priority, we would like to see the following priority order (for implementing):
    1) SMTP (email, supporting TLS/SSL)
    2) SNMP

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  11. DriveLock License Management (expire dates) over DOC, within an Enterprise Environment

    DES Servers, running into an an protected Enterprise Environment configured according Microsoft's Recommendation
    for an Enterprise-Access-Modell, should be able to renew their License Date (Maintenance Date) over the DOC,
    without having direct Internet access, and without getting each year a new license to activate by phone.
    An Implementation idea is maybe a Windows 10 Client System running DOC Companion, while the Client have
    Internet Access over a Company Proxy Server, to renew the License at the DES Server backend.

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    if you issue a new license annually (or whenever the maintenance is extended), then you don't even need one without activation, because the mmc does the activation and you can run it on a computer with internet access or use the telephone activation. You can either activate by telephone or issue the customer with a license without activation. Subscription licenses have to be reissued anyway, at least until now

  12. DOC deployment installation option should support DriveLock groups

    In the new DOC 21.2, it is possible to deploy new agent on computer. It would be very nice to be able to use drivelock groups here instead of a static list of PCs.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Usability  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  13. 3rd party events should be directly sent by SMTP/SNMP

    it seams 3rd party event can only be sent to the DES as oppose to DriveLock events that can be sent directly by the agent through SNMP/SMTP. Ths should be the case for 3rd party events too.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  14. Multiselection in white list rules under devices is not possibe

    In policy editor, it is possible to multi select WLR under drives in order to move them or delete them but it is not possible to do the very same thing in the devices category. It will be nice to have the same functionality.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Usability  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  15. Increase rule count limit under "user selection" rules

    Currently the "User selection" rule under Encryption 2-Go or File Protection allows a maximum of three (3) selectable rules. Suggesting to increase this limit to at least five (5) rules if possible.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    declined  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  16. DOC: Refresh individual widgets

    Currently you can only refresh the whole dashboard tab. Suggesting to also add the feature to allow refreshing a specific widget as needed.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Usability  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  17. Make secure deletion feature available with File Protection

    Currently the "secure delete" utility is only available with Encryption 2-Go license. Suggesting to also include it with File Protection license.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    declined  ·  0 comments  ·  File Encryption  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  18. Share custom DOC dashboards & widget via UserVoice

    Suggesting to allow and facilitate sharing of custom DOC dashboards and widgets created by DriveLock users (customers, resellers, consultants, etc.) via UserVoice or any other suitable platform.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    declined  ·  0 comments  ·  Usability  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  19. Too many messages, event ID: 129, because of locked devices

    Every time a user connects an iPhone or Android phone to a computer, our Drivelock server gets a message that a device has been connected there. This is not allowed by us and the device will be locked, then different
    Messages are sent Event ID: 129.
    Now my question, is it possible to create a rule in these cases:
    That the user always gets a message (bigger message, not only in the systray) to disconnect the device immediately until he disconnects the device? So that always new messages appear, which the user must click away and he is quasi forced…

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  20. Restart option after agent update

    Currently, a reboot before updating the agent can be configured via the option "Reboot to update agent". This causes the users to be logged out first, then DriveLock is updated and then a reboot occurs. If users logs on immediately afterwards, they can work for 2-3 minutes before a reboot occurs without further warning.

    It would be better for the users if the update would happen in the background without reboot (similar to push install/push update via the DCC). The user should get after successful update a message that he should close all programs because the computer reboots. This reboot…

    13 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    I don't see it as particularly important, because a reboot during an update is usually not useful. only FFE and FDE actually need a reboot - but only later when the agent is already running again and not when the msi is finished.

← Previous 1 3
  • Don't see your idea?

Feedback and Knowledge Base